Being a Sports Lawyer in India

As young budding lawyers, generally when asked about sports law, we have no clue about it. What is sports law? Is there any special Act dedicated to this field of law? If not, then which Acts are usually referred? Most of us would be as perplexed and confused as a non-law student would be.

Sports law in simple words is an umbrella term describing the legal issues related to sports. With regards to this specific area of law, a lot of questions may arise; the First, among those would be, is recognising and playing a sport for a reasonably long time enough to qualify as a sports lawyer? The answer to that is a NO! To become a sports lawyer, one should have keen interest in the administration and management of sporting activity. Moreover, it is required to substantiate such knowledge and to have great proficiency in law applicable to commercial activities. One should have expertise in law related to Contract, Media, Competition, Drafting and Negotiation. The study of the legislations controlling sporting activities and its structure of management in India would prepare one to take up sports law as a career in India.

Sports law is not a lawyer friendly term for many practitioners in India as it creates confusion in the minds of most of them. Confusions as to, what is the ambit of sports law? What would one do being a sports lawyer? Is there any work in this field that requires the attention of lawyers? The reason to all these questions and many more lies in the confusion caused between the functions of an administrator and a lawyer. In this field of law, there seems to be an intrinsic overlap of functions between these two service providers. Therefore,to establish as a sports lawyer in India is extremely tough. It might be astonishing to many that in a country like India with 1.2-billion population (approx.) the one and only name or face of the country successfully practicing sports law is Mr. Nandan Kamath. It also cannot be disregarded by the fact that the amount of support and participation GoSports Foundation gains exhibits that there is a keen interest among the young legal enthusiast to pursue a career in the legal side of sports. Few other Sports firms/companies where the legal front seems to be an important focus are: GameChange, GameChanger[1], which has its offices in Delhi and Bangalore in India; LAWNK in Bangaloreand TMT Law Practice[2] (Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi) which has Sports and Entertainment litigation listed as its area of practice. But, due to lack of substantial avenues and necessary spread of awareness amongst law students and young lawyers Sports Lawyering hasn’t emerged as a career option.

Another interesting thing to note is that the new generation Law schools have Law companies/firms coming down to their doorsteps to offer jobs to the graduating batch of students. The day for such on-campus-recruitment is colloquially called “Day Zero”. Of course not all potential recruiters make it on that one day; but the point being, that Sports Law firms don’t somehow feature in these list of firms visiting the law schools.

However in Europe or Australia, Sports lawyering is a big thing. People understand the importance of legal nuances in sports and provide for all the facilities possible to explore this area.

In India, when a sports lawyer tries to make his/hermark in this field, he is required to immensely engage in the field of administration. Apart from taking care of any future legal dispute, he is expected to carry out the work of agents, wherein he does managerial work of maintaining the player’s portfolio, advertisement, sponsorship, etc. As a consequence of this conflict of lack of definite identity in the kingdom of law, it becomes complicated for legal practitioners to establish themselves as a sports lawyer. What some of the existing sports administrators in fields like Tennis Officiating usually do before joining the professional turf is fetch themselves a Diploma Post Graduation Degree in Sports Management. There are a few institutes that offer these courses; and  Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management which has been offering this course since 2010-2011 is one such institute operating in Kolkata. But, it isn’t quite clear if sports lawyer enthusiasts should get such a Diploma degree or not if they are to make more sense out of their work in managing legal disputes relating to Sports or would a legal degree in Law suffice.

The ambiguity of their role and the overlap of functions create an uncertainty among the clients of their existence. Therefore, the first and the foremost challenge of a sport lawyer in India, is to justify their existence, not just their existence in the field per say but also the existence of the field itself.

Going back to law schools; majority of the law students discover their area of interest while they study law. In addition, they work towards enhancing their knowledge in the field of their interest throughout law school period. In this exercise, law schools aid the students substantially by providing elective choice of subject, having conferences and having various research centers working on different fields of law. However, it is witnessed that in terms of sports law there is a gap, which stays unfilled. Most of the law students who graduate from law school do so without gaining even the basic idea of what a sports lawyer does. Unexpectedly, the foundational knowledge of the legislation governing sports law in India is unheard of by many. Such a lacuna suppresses the interest of the few who might be interest in taking up Sports Law as profession. Two main reasons due to which interested law students get discouraged to pursue this field of law; firstly, the lack of adequate teaching mechanism and secondly, lack of exposure between the students and the existing lawyers in the field of sports law.

 Problems or the negative side of sporting activity is well witnessed in IPL fiasco, the CWG catastrophe and the weight-lifting shame etc. -. Many questions have been raised by the critiques but unfortunately most of these questions have remained unanswered; since no one looks into the reasons for the same. A questions lead to more questions and the blame game goes on. The root of the matter stays unaddressed – Indian sports lacks good governance and a dynamic regulatory framework. Enlightenment of such matters is of utmost importance and to become a sports lawyer especially in a country like India.

Being a Sports lawyer in India is much different from being one  in Australia. Unlike India, in Australia there is national Act i.e. Australian Sports Commission Act, 1989. It was enacted to establish the Australian Sports Commission (“ASC”). It is a statutory authority of the Australian Government that is governed by the board of Commissioners appointed by the Minister for Sports.  It is responsible for distributing funds and providing strategic guidance for sporting activity in Australia. The “ASC’s roles and responsibility are prescribed in the Australian Sports Commission Act, 1989. It is also involved in the implementation of major policy decision principally through three divisions, the Australian Institute of Sports, Community Sport and Sport Performance and Development. For the efficiency of the implementation of these policy decisions it works closely with a range of sporting organisations, state and local governments, schools and community organisations. This ensures that sports in the country is run well and is accessible to all. Therefore, there is recognition of this field more than in India and that makes it much simpler for one to establish themselves in this field of law there, than here.Hence, there is an imminent need that we strive to create awareness along with educational facilities to understand Sports Advocacy better.



Picture Credits:

Is Companies Act, 2013 actually Changing Fortunes?

Is Companies Act, 2013 actually Changing Fortunes?

The Companies Act, 1956 had been in need of a substantial revamp for quite some time. The 1956 Act was passed in the first decade of free India and the business landscape has changed radically ever since. The opening of the Indian economy in the early 1990s posed newer and greater challenges for the corporate world. The Companies Act, 2013 seems to focus on the factors which have an impact on the governance of the company such as risk management, due diligence, etc. In several other areas also an attempt has been made to harmonise the law with international requirements. The new Act is a modern legislation which would enable growth and greater regulation of the corporate sector in India in a rapidly changing economic, commercial and technological environment, both nationally and globally. The new Act emphasises on two concepts i.e. democracy of shareholders and supremacy of shareholders. The new Act facilitates stricter enforcement of provisions, higher levels of transparency, business friendly corporate regulations, improved corporate governance[1] norms, e-management (electronic management), enhanced accountability on the part of key management and auditors, protection of interest of investors, employee friendliness, whistle blower protection[2], and corporate social responsibility[3].

One of the major objectives behind the new Act is Shareholders democracy. It has been considered as a mode of Corporate Governance which also increases independence of shareholders with a view to make the shareholders more knowledgeable and informed about their rights. As specified in the new Act[4], all major transactions such as inter-corporate investments, guarantees, securities, managerial remuneration, related party transactions etc., need approval from shareholders. The concept of class action suits has also been introduced under Section 245 which provides for shareholder rights or protection because it gives scope to consumer organizations to bring claims on behalf of large groups of consumers.

The concept of e-governance tends to reduce paper work and provide higher level of transparency and disclosure as the important and specified documents such as financial statements have to be available on the company’s website. It also tries to promote user friendly environment by making maintenance and inspection of the documents easier, simpler and faster. The concept of e-voting and video-conferencing in meetings facilitates the participation of the shareholders and directors from around the globe and these have been introduced under Sections 174 and 175 of the Companies Act, 2013 where the quorum for the meetings of board and passing of resolutions can be achieved through audio visual means. The new Act also lays emphasis on higher levels of transparency as well as enhanced accountability on the part of key management by introducing some new regulatory bodies such as National Company Law Tribunal under Section 408, National Financial Reporting Authority under Section 132, and Special Courts for speedy trial under Section 435.

The new Act seems to be employee friendly as it mandates the disclosure of difference of salaries of the Directors and the average employees. It also gives a provision for Auditor rotation after every 5 years which will increase efficiency of the company as it will bring the books of accounts of the company under fresh eyes which may help to point out issues which the previous Auditor may not have been able to identify. Also, the Auditors tend to lose their independence after a certain period of time if they keep working for the same company as they come under the dominance of the key managerial personnel.

Making it mandatory for the audit firms to rotate is one of the measures of improving the independence, objectivity, and professional scepticism of auditors.[5] The rotation of Auditors is now mandatory not just for listed companies but for all companies including private companies covered in class of companies mentioned in Rule 5 of Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014.[6]

Every listed or any other company as prescribed under the Act has to mandatorily establish a vigil mechanism for staff and Directors for reporting genuine concerns under Section 177(9). This mechanism needs to be established to provide safeguards against victimization of the whistleblower, who may be an employee, Superior Officer or any Designated Officer.[7] It ensures anonymity of whistle blower. The details of this mechanism have to be disclosed on the company’s website as well as in the Board’s report.

Every company having a net worth of INR500 crores or more or a turnover of INR1000 crores or more or a net profit of INR5 crores or more in any financial year shall constitute a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee.[8] This CSR committee will formulate and recommend CSR activities to the Board. The Committee will recommend the amount to be incurred and monitor the CSR activities of the company. The company should comply with the policies of the committee and disclose the policy in the Board Report. In case of any failure, reasons have to be disclosed in the Report. The company should give preference to the local area where it operates, for spending the amount earmarked for CSR activities. This will help in improving the conditions of the weaker sections of society, in return for which the company will gain in terms of goodwill and long- term survival.

The new Act not only brings some new provisions but also strikes off some old provisions which have become obsolete with time. A large number of sections have not been notified yet and the other provisions are largely to be tested. A number of provisions still need some clarifications.

The new Act which has a number of new provisions faces a few challenges as well:

The term ‘shareholders democracy’ which sounds so fascinating is not that easy to attain. The challenge which the new Act faces is whether this objective of shareholders’ democracy is actually attainable? Also, it is not only the shareholders whose interests have to be safeguarded by the company; there are some other people also who are related to it. Any person directly or indirectly related to the company is referred to as ‘stakeholder’. Now the question that arises is will this democracy improve the conditions of non-shareholders i.e., ‘stakeholders’ such as employees, creditors, consumers, etc?

The Companies Act, 2013 has tried to change the rules of the game by providing provisions for mandatory approval from shareholders in certain cases by making them the major players, but these major players i.e., the shareholders are often ill-informed to take important decisions such as intercorporate investments, managerial remuneration, etc.

The new Act creates a doubt as to whether making CSR will actually benefit the society or will it just provide tax benefit to the companies. It can be seen now that these companies are the way for emergence of CSR consultants who help companies to make tax beneficial policies.

The companies Act has tried to change the fortunes of the companies by changing the rules for them. Now, the major questions that arise after the new Act are: Can an Act become redundant in six decades? Whether the 1956 Act has become totally obsolete? Whether the companies will be able to adapt to the new Act when it needs a plethora of clarifications? It can be hoped that the MCA and the concerned regulatory bodies will soon address such challenges to truly make the new Companies Act, an exemplary reformative step forward in empowering India Incorporated.[9]

[1] Corporate Governance: The system of rules, practices and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. Corporate governance essentially involves balancing the interests of the many stakeholders in a company – these include its shareholders, management, customers, suppliers, financiers, government and the community. Since corporate governance also provides the framework for attaining a company’s objectives, it encompasses practically every sphere of management, from action plans and internal controls to performance measurement and corporate disclosure.

[2]Whistle blowing’ is when a worker reports suspected wrongdoing at work. Officially this is called ‘making a disclosure in the public interest’.

A worker can report things that aren’t right, are illegal or if anyone at work is neglecting their duties, including:

  • someone’s health and safety is in danger
  • damage to the environment
  • a criminal offence
  • the company isn’t obeying the law (like not having the right insurance)
  • covering up wrongdoing

[3] Corporate Social Responsibility is a management concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and interactions with their stakeholders.

[4] Section-185: Loan to Directors

Section-186: Intercorporate Loans or Investments

Section-188 and Rule 16: Approval and Disclosure of Related Party Transactions

Section-197: Managerial Remuneration

All the above-mentioned provisions need shareholders’ approval

[5] As specified under Section 139(2) of the Companies Act, 2013


[7] As per Section 177(10) of the Companies Act, 2013

[8] As provided under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013


What can you do if someone owes you money and does not pay you back?

Before legal action is taken against a debtor,the claim should be brought to his or her notice to make sure that the debtor is aware of the fact that the debt has not been paid back. A letter should be sent to the debtor containing important details and specifics. This should include information concerning the debt, for instance, how the debt was incurred, the original amount of the debt, when the last payment was made, and the current amount that is due to be paid back. The letter should also mention information regarding the paymentarrangement, providing the debtor with a phone number or an address in order to get back to the creditor.Most importantly, a due date should be provided to the debtor mentioning by which date he or she must make payment arrangements in totality. The idea is to choose a reasonable date and allow the debtor some time after he or she reads the letter to repay the debt. Also time must be given for the debtor to respond. At this stage, it is better to motivate the debtor rather than throw him/her into panic. A copy of this correspondence should be saved.

If this date passes without any payment of the debt being made or any indication of it being paid in the near future, one could send a letter of demand from a lawyer’s office, before commencing any legal action. The problem may be solved by way of negotiation[1].

If this too fails, either by way of the debtor not responding or refusing to make the payments, it may be necessary to institute legal proceedings against the debtor. Relevant papers in one’s possession that are related to the amount due (debt)debt or any documents of a similar sort including a copy of the correspondence between oneself and the debtor should be kept.

The limitation period for filing a civil recovery suit in India is 3 years. After that the claim is barred by time. It is imperative to decide which Court of law one should file their suit for recovery. In India, according to the Civil Procedure Jurisdiction, the pecuniary or monetary jurisdiction of the Courts depends on the state in which the cause of action arises. The pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court divides the Court on a vertical basis, which means that depending on the valuation of the suit filed, there are different levels of Courts with different monetary jurisdictions, and the suit will have to be instituted in the Court which has the required jurisdiction.  For example, the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Courts in Delhi areas follows:

  • Suits amounting to Rs.1 – Rs.20, 00,000/- lie before District Courts.
  • Suits over and above Rs. 20,00,000/- lie before the High Court.

It is essential to remember that the amount of pecuniary jurisdiction is different for all High Courts in India. This limit is decided by respective High Court Rules and in many states the High Court has no pecuniary jurisdiction. All civil suits go before the District Courts, and only appeals lie before the High Court.  The creditor, that is the one who owes the will have to determine in which Court the claim can be filed, which in turn shall be determined in accordance with the amount claimed. If the Court finds that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the, it shall transfer the suit to the Court having jurisdiction. In order to verify the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Courts in a particular state, one must refer to the rules determining the pecuniary jurisdiction of the district courts which have original jurisdiction[2].

The parties can appear in Court on their own, but it is not uncommon to be represented by a lawyer. If one does not appear, the Court or Tribunal can dismiss or adjourn the case. If either party does not appear, the other may obtain the judgment by default. Any promissory note, contract made, or any other documentary evidence of the debt should be provided to the Courtby the debtor, or his or her attorney. One should make such copies of any evidence to be submitted. Both parties will be given the opportunity to explain their stands before the court. If the court gives judgment against the debtor the amount that the debtor has to pay, including court costs becomes payable immediately from the date of judgment. This judgment could be obtained following the hearing of the case,or in the situation of the non-appearance of one of the parties, on default. If one is dissatisfied with the judgment, one can always appeal to the High Court. In case one finds the proceedings to be long winded or elaborate, it is best to consider hiring a lawyer, who are well-versed in the procedures of Courts and Tribunals.

[1] :“Contracts. Illegal Contracts. Recovery of Money Paid”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 8 (May, 1917

[2] Civil Procedure with Limitation Act, 1963 by C.K. Takwani (Thakker), 7th Edition, 2013, Reprinted 2015, along with Sanjiva Row’s The Limitation Act, 1963, II Vols. 9th Edition

The Importance of Being Importer Friendly

By Ashwini Tallur, National Law University Jodhpur


We all realize the importance of trade and commerce and most of us are aware of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the only global international organization dealing with the rules of trade between nations[1], formed in 1995. The WTO replaced the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), an agreement signed in 1947. The replacement now has four major documents: a major revision of the original GATT, General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), The Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), and the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU).

Until then, the GATT set out important rules governing trade between countries, and had been the forum for negotiating lower customs duty rates and other trade barriers. Since 1995, the updated GATT has become the WTO’s umbrella agreement for trade in goods.[2] Article VIII of the GATT 1995, in particular caught my attention. You can read the Article here. The Article basically states that countries that are a part of the WTO, must ensure that the importers or exporters must not be subject to too many burdensome formalities and requirements.

This was when I thought, how easy is importing for our own importers? The GATT seeks to prevent one country’s protective measures against another. But what about the importers within the same country? There are importers I know, who, despite living in Kolkata, which is closer by sea to Hong Kong (where they import goods from), route it through other cities, like Mumbai, despite the round-about route, simply because it is less burdensome, faster, and people are generally more eager to work.  So which states are most businessman friendly, especially when it comes to importing?

Let us look at the overall figures. Gujarat stands at the top of a number of lists[3]. According to the Economic Freedom of the States of India Report- 2013, Gujarat is not only the freest state, but it has also registered the fastest rate of improvement with an average growth of 12%.[4] In the same report in 2005, its overall score was 0.46 (Rank 5), which is 0.65 (Rank 1) in 2013. There is also a very wide gap between Gujarat and the second in rank, in the report (Tamil Nadu, with a score of 0.57). In a report by the CLSA[5], the reasons that Gujarat seems to be doing so well is that: firstly, unlike the other states who jumped from an agrarian economy directly to a service sector centric economy, Gujarat made sure that it has many manufacturing industries, which provide for large scale employment. Even so, it did not ignore its agrarian sector. The report goes on to say, that agriculture contributes 13 per cent to Gujarat’s GDP and supports 53 per cent of the population. Yields in food grains are almost double the country’s average. Secondly, its long coastline and entrepreneurial nature of its people are certainly a plus. Thirdly, its dependence on funds from the centre has been low, with 84% of its revenue coming from taxes. Also, the report point out, Gujarat does not ignore the expenditure on medical and educational facilities by replacing it with social security in welfare, a mistake made at the national level.

In the Economic Freedom report, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu are followed by Andhra Pradesh, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh.

It is believed that Tamil Nadu is ranked so high up, because of the effective legal machinery. With a low rate of dacoity and robbery reported in 2012 (no cases, according to the National Crimes Records Bureau); people in general afraid to break the law; bribes being low, and sometimes nil; zero tolerance for communal violence; and swift arbitration and conciliation, Tamil Nadu, many believe[6], deserves to stand at Rank 2. However, its points get docked when it comes to its high rate of labour disputes and severe shortage of power, to which there seems to be no solution so far.

The regulation of labour and business is a very important factor for a businessman, which is one of the three factors the Economic Freedom Report looks at.[7] Gujarat has been rank 1 since 2005, till 2013[8]. Tamil Nadu, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Karnataka, Maharashtra and Kerala follow respectively.[9] Once again, there is a very large gap between the score of Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, making Gujarat the most conducive for business in this category, without question. According to the report, there has been a sharp decline in man-days lost due to strikes, higher market wage rates, and a decline in pendency of cases.[10]

As for Andhra Pradesh, which ranks 3rd in the report, it seems to be by virtue of it being a large base for Agro and Food Processing (especially since the state accommodates seven different agro-climatic conditions); the “mineral house of the country”; the “bulk drug capital” of the country, with 1/3rd of the country’s Bulk Drug Production; and a huge IT economy.[11] However, with the state being split into two,[12] we have to see how things will work out for each of the two new states.

In my next blog post, I will be concluding my article after looking at how individual cities fare at treating importers.



In my previous blog post, I discussed the import-friendliness of states. Let us now look at the performance of individual cities and where India stands as a nation, and why all this matters.

When it comes to ease of importing in cities, Bhubaneswar seems to be the friendliest city, according to the Doing Business Report by the International Finance Corporation and the World Bank[13], with 16 days taken to import goods.[14] Ahmedabad does come a close second with 18 days taken to import. The costliest city according to the report is Jaipur (at US$1,384 per container).[15] A clothes merchant based in Kolkata, who wishes to remain anonymous, told me that Chennai and Vishakapatnam are also very friendly when it comes to imports. He categorically states that Kolkata is quite hostile to importers. The Kidderpore port in Kolkata, for instance, is badly maintained and under-utilised. There seems to be an unwillingness to create a business friendly environment, he said, labeling the attitude as "babu-giri".

India doesn’t seem to fare that well in the world, being ranked 48 according to Bloomsberg Ranking[16]; Rank 98 according to Forbes[17]; and Rank 134 in the Doing Business Report 2014[18]. The Doing Business Report puts India at Rank 132 for ease of trading across borders, a 3-Rank fall from the previous year. It takes 11 documents, on an average, to import something into India, compared to 10 for the South Asian countries and 4 for the OECD.[19] It takes an average of 20 days to import something into India, while it takes on 10 days for the OECD.[20]

India’s economic freedom has undoubtedly increased since the 1990s, yet India’s ratings remain low on the global index. As the Economic Freedom report rightly states, as India opens its national markets to international investment and commodity flows, it cannot afford to constrain its own entrepreneurs. India is a very centralized country, especially compared to China.[21] Yes, we use the phrase “centre-state relations”, but as the report has correctly pointed out, it “reflects a patronizing mindset, suggestive of a centre and a periphery”. Perhaps this is a legacy of our independence struggle, one which we seem to have inherited unknowingly, due to the predominance of a single party back then.[22] Ironically, the “Centre” so far seems to suffer from a lack of interest and/or ability to change things, thus putting the burden on the “states”.

With the reported increase in imports[23], it is high time that the “centre” learns something from the leading states and implements the same. With US$489 billion worth of imports, India is ranked the 10th biggest importer in the world, by the WTO, accounting for 2.6% of the world’s imports.[24] You can see how much of each product India imports here. You can also check out the import tariffs for agricultural products here.

The WTO realizes how important it is to protect its members from harassment in the form of delays and unnecessary rules. It is time we realize the same. Is the proposal of letting the Major Ports decide tariff rates going to serve this purpose?[25] Maybe, maybe not. Perhaps, with the ex-CM of the leading state of Gujarat as our new Prime Minister for the next sixty months, we might see some improvement for the importers. The Modi government promised the country: achhe din aane waale hain (Good days are going to come). Only time will tell how good the days of the future are going to be. We can only hope and wait for them to fulfill this promise of theirs.

[1] As per the website,


[3] See, for instance this, this or this. You could also read this article, which gives five things that make Gujarat different from other states.

[4] Economic Freedom of the States of India Report- 2013, Bibek Debroy, Laveesh Bhandari, Swaminathan S. Anklesaria Aiyar. Available at

[5] See for five things that make Gujarat better than the other states.

[6] See

[7] The report looks at the size of the government: expenditures, taxes and enterprises; legal structure of the state; and regulation of labour and business in the state, and awards points accordingly.

[8] With a score of 0.87.

[9] Scores: 0.51, 0.46, 0.46, 0.44, 0.43, 0.42 Respectively. See Table 1.6 of the Report.

[10] Page 34 of the Report.

[11] Read the detailed report by Commiserate of Industries and FICCI on how Andhra Pradesh is a great state for business here.

[12] See

[13] See in general, and in particular.

[14] See how the time and all related parameters are calculated here

[15] However, this could be because the report takes into account goods imported by sea transport.

[16] See

[17] See

[18] See

[19] See

[20] The number takes into account: Documents preparation; Customs clearance and technical control; P orts and terminal handling; And Inland transportation and handling. The documents considered are: Bill of Entry, Bill of Lading, Cargo release Order, Certificate of Origin, Technical standard Certificate, Commercial Invoice, Foreign Exchange Control Form, Inspection report, Packing list, Product manual and Terminal handling receipts.

[21] Bardhan, Pranab (2010). Awakening Giants, Feet of Clay, Assessing the Economic Rise of China and India. Oxford University Press, in the Economic Freedom of States in Inida Report (Page 73).

[22] For more on this, see Report of the Commission on Centre-State Relations, available at

[23] India's imports gained while exports grew negligibly from FTAs: ASSOCHAM study. Article available here.

[24] See Appendix table 3 here. Also see a detailed report on India’s imports and exports, by The Guardian here.